From a46ceb6b2816dfdff3d2d686fdeda6651167bf34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: klm Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 00:59:26 +0000 Subject: Make the disabled notice less ambiguous - reorganized so it's clear what phrase is or is not negated: old: Mailman-Checkins member klm@python.org disabled due to bounces old: Mailman-Checkins member klm@python.org NOT disabled due to bounces vs new: Mailman-Checkins member klm@python.org bouncing - disabled new: Mailman-Checkins member klm@python.org bouncing - NOT disabled In the NOT version of the old, it would seem to be saying that the member was NOT disable _because_ of the bounces, not the case at all. --- Mailman/Bouncer.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'Mailman') diff --git a/Mailman/Bouncer.py b/Mailman/Bouncer.py index 10ed8369b..70787e868 100644 --- a/Mailman/Bouncer.py +++ b/Mailman/Bouncer.py @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ class Bouncer: negative = string.upper(negative) self.SendTextToUser( - subject = "%s member %s %s%s due to bounces" + subject = "%s member %s bouncing - %s%s" % (self.real_name, addr, negative, did), recipient = recipient, sender = mm_cfg.MAILMAN_OWNER, -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2