summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Mailman/pipeline/avoid_duplicates.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBarry Warsaw2008-02-17 17:34:21 -0500
committerBarry Warsaw2008-02-17 17:34:21 -0500
commit69d158b13ae9cfa37040c2e7a664ca266b42050b (patch)
tree07f48ee990b6bab514f86199eaa250a04280120c /Mailman/pipeline/avoid_duplicates.py
parentb36de8a6a5b84021c003b728274f7e9e95861c9d (diff)
downloadmailman-69d158b13ae9cfa37040c2e7a664ca266b42050b.tar.gz
mailman-69d158b13ae9cfa37040c2e7a664ca266b42050b.tar.zst
mailman-69d158b13ae9cfa37040c2e7a664ca266b42050b.zip
Diffstat (limited to 'Mailman/pipeline/avoid_duplicates.py')
-rw-r--r--Mailman/pipeline/avoid_duplicates.py140
1 files changed, 80 insertions, 60 deletions
diff --git a/Mailman/pipeline/avoid_duplicates.py b/Mailman/pipeline/avoid_duplicates.py
index 2c52a7781..78a65c8c8 100644
--- a/Mailman/pipeline/avoid_duplicates.py
+++ b/Mailman/pipeline/avoid_duplicates.py
@@ -23,71 +23,91 @@ has already received a copy, we either drop the message, add a duplicate
warning header, or pass it through, depending on the user's preferences.
"""
+__metaclass__ = type
+__all__ = ['AvoidDuplicates']
+
+
from email.Utils import getaddresses, formataddr
+from zope.interface import implements
+
from Mailman.configuration import config
+from Mailman.i18n import _
+from Mailman.interfaces import IHandler
+
COMMASPACE = ', '
-def process(mlist, msg, msgdata):
- recips = msgdata.get('recips')
- # Short circuit
- if not recips:
- return
- # Seed this set with addresses we don't care about dup avoiding.
- listaddrs = set((mlist.posting_address,
- mlist.bounces_address,
- mlist.owner_address,
- mlist.request_address))
- explicit_recips = listaddrs.copy()
- # Figure out the set of explicit recipients
- cc_addresses = {}
- for header in ('to', 'cc', 'resent-to', 'resent-cc'):
- addrs = getaddresses(msg.get_all(header, []))
- header_addresses = dict((addr, formataddr((name, addr)))
- for name, addr in addrs
- if addr)
- if header == 'cc':
- # Yes, it's possible that an address is mentioned in multiple CC
- # headers using different names. In that case, the last real name
- # will win, but that doesn't seem like such a big deal. Besides,
- # how else would you chose?
- cc_addresses.update(header_addresses)
- # Ignore the list addresses for purposes of dup avoidance.
- explicit_recips |= set(header_addresses)
- # Now strip out the list addresses
- explicit_recips -= listaddrs
- if not explicit_recips:
- # No one was explicitly addressed, so we can't do any dup collapsing
- return
- newrecips = set()
- for r in recips:
- # If this recipient is explicitly addressed...
- if r in explicit_recips:
- send_duplicate = True
- # If the member wants to receive duplicates, or if the recipient
- # is not a member at all, they will get a copy.
- # header.
- member = mlist.members.get_member(r)
- if member and not member.receive_list_copy:
- send_duplicate = False
- # We'll send a duplicate unless the user doesn't wish it. If
- # personalization is enabled, the add-dupe-header flag will add a
- # X-Mailman-Duplicate: yes header for this user's message.
- if send_duplicate:
- msgdata.setdefault('add-dup-header', set()).add(r)
+class AvoidDuplicates:
+ """If the user wishes it, do not send duplicates of the same message."""
+
+ implements(IHandler)
+
+ name = 'avoid-duplicates'
+ description = _('Suppress some duplicates of the same message.')
+
+ def process(self, mlist, msg, msgdata):
+ """See `IHandler`."""
+ recips = msgdata.get('recips')
+ # Short circuit
+ if not recips:
+ return
+ # Seed this set with addresses we don't care about dup avoiding.
+ listaddrs = set((mlist.posting_address,
+ mlist.bounces_address,
+ mlist.owner_address,
+ mlist.request_address))
+ explicit_recips = listaddrs.copy()
+ # Figure out the set of explicit recipients.
+ cc_addresses = {}
+ for header in ('to', 'cc', 'resent-to', 'resent-cc'):
+ addrs = getaddresses(msg.get_all(header, []))
+ header_addresses = dict((addr, formataddr((name, addr)))
+ for name, addr in addrs
+ if addr)
+ if header == 'cc':
+ # Yes, it's possible that an address is mentioned in multiple
+ # CC headers using different names. In that case, the last
+ # real name will win, but that doesn't seem like such a big
+ # deal. Besides, how else would you chose?
+ cc_addresses.update(header_addresses)
+ # Ignore the list addresses for purposes of dup avoidance.
+ explicit_recips |= set(header_addresses)
+ # Now strip out the list addresses.
+ explicit_recips -= listaddrs
+ if not explicit_recips:
+ # No one was explicitly addressed, so we can't do any dup
+ # collapsing
+ return
+ newrecips = set()
+ for r in recips:
+ # If this recipient is explicitly addressed...
+ if r in explicit_recips:
+ send_duplicate = True
+ # If the member wants to receive duplicates, or if the
+ # recipient is not a member at all, they will get a copy.
+ # header.
+ member = mlist.members.get_member(r)
+ if member and not member.receive_list_copy:
+ send_duplicate = False
+ # We'll send a duplicate unless the user doesn't wish it. If
+ # personalization is enabled, the add-dupe-header flag will
+ # add a X-Mailman-Duplicate: yes header for this user's
+ # message.
+ if send_duplicate:
+ msgdata.setdefault('add-dup-header', set()).add(r)
+ newrecips.add(r)
+ elif r in cc_addresses:
+ del cc_addresses[r]
+ else:
+ # Otherwise, this is the first time they've been in the recips
+ # list. Add them to the newrecips list and flag them as
+ # having received this message.
newrecips.add(r)
- elif r in cc_addresses:
- del cc_addresses[r]
- else:
- # Otherwise, this is the first time they've been in the recips
- # list. Add them to the newrecips list and flag them as having
- # received this message.
- newrecips.add(r)
- # Set the new list of recipients. XXX recips should always be a set.
- msgdata['recips'] = list(newrecips)
- # RFC 2822 specifies zero or one CC header
- if cc_addresses:
- del msg['cc']
- msg['CC'] = COMMASPACE.join(cc_addresses.values())
+ # Set the new list of recipients. XXX recips should always be a set.
+ msgdata['recips'] = list(newrecips)
+ # RFC 2822 specifies zero or one CC header
+ if cc_addresses:
+ del msg['cc']
+ msg['CC'] = COMMASPACE.join(cc_addresses.values())