From 9f66f59477bb75b804f265f373106b9de1715500 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bojidar Marinov Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:18:35 +0300 Subject: Ternary operator in GDScript (a if x else b) Fixes #1961 --- modules/gdscript/gd_parser.cpp | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) (limited to 'modules/gdscript/gd_parser.cpp') diff --git a/modules/gdscript/gd_parser.cpp b/modules/gdscript/gd_parser.cpp index e5a8dc015..9c025b68a 100644 --- a/modules/gdscript/gd_parser.cpp +++ b/modules/gdscript/gd_parser.cpp @@ -936,6 +936,8 @@ GDParser::Node* GDParser::_parse_expression(Node *p_parent,bool p_static,bool p_ case GDTokenizer::TK_OP_BIT_OR: op=OperatorNode::OP_BIT_OR ; break; case GDTokenizer::TK_OP_BIT_XOR: op=OperatorNode::OP_BIT_XOR ; break; case GDTokenizer::TK_PR_EXTENDS: op=OperatorNode::OP_EXTENDS; break; + case GDTokenizer::TK_CF_IF: op=OperatorNode::OP_TERNARY_IF; break; + case GDTokenizer::TK_CF_ELSE: op=OperatorNode::OP_TERNARY_ELSE; break; default: valid=false; break; } @@ -958,6 +960,7 @@ GDParser::Node* GDParser::_parse_expression(Node *p_parent,bool p_static,bool p_ int next_op=-1; int min_priority=0xFFFFF; bool is_unary=false; + bool is_ternary=false; for(int i=0;i=(expression.size()-1)) { + _set_error("Parser bug.."); + ERR_FAIL_V(NULL); + } + + if(next_op>=(expression.size()-2) || expression[next_op+2].op != OperatorNode::OP_TERNARY_ELSE) { + _set_error("Expected else after ternary if."); + ERR_FAIL_V(NULL); + } + if(next_op>=(expression.size()-3)) { + _set_error("Expected value after ternary else."); + ERR_FAIL_V(NULL); + } + + OperatorNode *op = alloc_node(); + op->op=expression[next_op].op; + op->line=op_line; //line might have been changed from a \n + + if (expression[next_op-1].is_op) { + + _set_error("Parser bug.."); + ERR_FAIL_V(NULL); + } + + if (expression[next_op+1].is_op) { + // this is not invalid and can really appear + // but it becomes invalid anyway because no binary op + // can be followed by an unary op in a valid combination, + // due to how precedence works, unaries will always dissapear first + + _set_error("Unexpected two consecutive operators after ternary if."); + return NULL; + } + + if (expression[next_op+3].is_op) { + // this is not invalid and can really appear + // but it becomes invalid anyway because no binary op + // can be followed by an unary op in a valid combination, + // due to how precedence works, unaries will always dissapear first + + _set_error("Unexpected two consecutive operators after ternary else."); + return NULL; + } + + + op->arguments.push_back(expression[next_op+1].node); //next expression goes as first + op->arguments.push_back(expression[next_op-1].node); //left expression goes as when-true + op->arguments.push_back(expression[next_op+3].node); //expression after next goes as when-false + + //replace all 3 nodes by this operator and make it an expression + expression[next_op-1].node=op; + expression.remove(next_op); + expression.remove(next_op); + expression.remove(next_op); + expression.remove(next_op); } else { if (next_op <1 || next_op>=(expression.size()-1)) { -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2